whats better lightroom 6 or lightroom cc

#WHATS BETTER LIGHTROOM 6 OR LIGHTROOM CC ANDROID#
#WHATS BETTER LIGHTROOM 6 OR LIGHTROOM CC DOWNLOAD#

Once I started using Lightroom as my primary camera app on my iPhone, I had to come to terms with adding originals to my library via sync. Lightroom CC for iOS was the gateway drug to my comfort with this workflow. Anything I sync up from Lightroom Classic appears in Lightroom CC (desktop and mobile). Photos that I add to Lightroom CC get downloaded automatically to Lightroom Classic. This is totally possible, and what I’m doing right now. Using Lightroom CC and Lightroom Classic Together If you've already been using Lightroom for web or iOS/Android, it will be immediatly familiar and useful.

#WHATS BETTER LIGHTROOM 6 OR LIGHTROOM CC DOWNLOAD#

It very much feels to me that this is how digital photography should be, and the cloud-centric workflow of Lightroom CC is, to me, its best and most important feature.ĬC Subscribers can download and start using Lightroom CC now. But I never wanted what they were selling, because I like Lightroom’s processing too much. Google and Apple already have exactly this setup.

Importing is therefore very simple, with almost no options, because this is the fundament of Lightroom CC: Adobe stores your originals on their servers, you access them from any device you like.Īdobe is, of course, playing catch-up here. Lightroom CC syncs all of your camera originals to the cloud. What there is, instead, is a glorious simplification of the most historically vexing aspect of photo management: Where are my files? Most people I know who tried and failed to get started with Lightroom got hung up on on this seemingly simple point. No soft-proofing, no print layouts, no face detection, no HDR or panorama merging, no support for third-party hardware controllers. There’s no way to nudge up the exposure on three shots at once, or to automatically updated a published folder of custom-configured JPEGs. There’s none of Lightroom Classic’s geo-tagging or book-making, or even the tone curve or split-toning controls you’ll find in Lightroom CC for iOS and Android. This sense of focus comes at a cost of course: Lightroom CC has a tiny fraction of the functionality of Lightroom Classic.

It feels like Lightroom for iPad, ported to the Desktop. The new Lightroom is simple, clean, minimal, and modern. Now that Lightroom is the old dog, the answer is. How do you modernize something that’s so feature-rich? How do you simplify a tool with hundreds of tiny-but-essential workflows that scores of people rely on? Back when Photoshop was the incumbent, the answer was Lightroom. This is ironic given that Lightroom was conceived from within Adobe as a disruptive rethink to photo workflows. It’s powerful, with well-trodden workflows aplenty, but it’s also starting to feel bloated and out-of-date. Lightroom Classic has the classic double-edged sword situation of mature, well-loved software. My favorite thing to do with it is enhance color contrast by keying in warmer warms in a shot to which I’ve given an overall cool tone, or vise versa. I’ve found this new color control to be very useful. You can now further isolate a Local Adjustment with a color picker or luminance range mask. Lightroom Classic got a small but meaningful upgrade, with performance improvements that you’ll actually notice, and a new trick for Local Adjustments called Color Range Masking. People downloading “Lightroom” will search the web for help and tutorials, and what they find will be referring to something very different from what is on their screen.

They wanted to both signal that Lightroom CC, the connected, cloud-synced, slick-new-hotness, joins Lightroom web and Lightroom mobile to form their new and ongoing vision of Lightroom, and also ensure folks that the Lightroom they know and love is not being discontinued.īut the path they chose is going to cause problems.

Last thing about the names: This stuff is hard, and Adobe worked hard on it.

#WHATS BETTER LIGHTROOM 6 OR LIGHTROOM CC ANDROID#

Adobe’s own website is gleefully inconsistent with this naming.įor the sake of sanity, the Prolost style guide for Lightroom will be Lightroom CC for the new cloudy thing (including the iOS and Android apps), and Lightroom Classic for the venerable old desktop girl. The “new Lightroom,” previewed last year as “Project Nimbus,” will generally be colloquially known as Lightroom CC, but in fact also has “Photoshop” uselessly grafted into its seldom-used official title, Adobe Photoshop Lightroom CC. No one ever uses this version of the name, but that’s the actual name (found only in the splash screen). But the official Adobe name is Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic CC. Within the app, “the old Lightroom” refers to itself as Adobe Lightroom Classic CC. It’s actually worse than Benjamin is letting on though.

Whats better lightroom 6 or lightroom cc